I just committed
http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=c488b68e75ee5304007eef37203c4fc10193d191
which suppresses construction of a dhcp-range if there's an explict
dhcp-range already.
Testing would be very useful.
Cheers,
Simon.
On 19/04/18 03:38, Luis Marsano wrote:
>
It will detect servers coming and going. There's no need to restart.
Cheers,
Simon.
On 14/05/18 10:22, Prasad K wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can dnsmasq automatically starting using an upstream DNS server which
> was unavailable for a short duration and came back online ?
>
> For example :
0.0.0.0 as router address in an option-121 is defined in the RFC to mean
something different, so substituting it in dnsmasq would be bad. quote
RFC 3442
Local Subnet Routes
In some cases more than one IP subnet may be configured on a link.
In such cases, a host whose IP address is in one
On 14/05/18 18:50, Chris Green wrote:
> I have a large house and run two Draytek Vigor routers to provide full
> coverage. The 'main' router is a Draytek 2860n which has the VDSL
> connection to the internet. The second router is a Draytek Vigoer
> 2820n which has no WAN connections and just has
Note that trying all servers frequently has no performance hit, apart
from the marginal extra bandwidth and upstream load. The original
requestor still gets an answer as soon as the fastest server responds.
(The parameters controlling this are in src/config.h)
Cheers,
Simon
On 15/05/18
On 29/05/18 23:11, Stephen Howell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm an occasional sysadmin and I was looking to setup a round-robin
> wildcard CNAME for a test project at home. I checked the dnsmasq docs
> and saw:
>
> *--cname* as long as the record name is in the authoritative domain. If
> the target of
On Tuesday 23 May 2017 09:39:11 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 22 May 2017 23:11:02 Simon Kelley wrote:
> > On 12/05/17 16:32, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Friday 12 May 2017 17:15:20 Simon Kelley wrote:
> > >> There are so many layers of quotes here that I've completely lost
> > >> track of what we
Hi Kevin,
Can you include the context of these lines?
When I query x.y.168.192.in-addr-arpa without --bogus-priv I get
SERVFAIL, because Google public DNS returns an unsigned reply to
dnssec-query[DS] 168.192.in-addr.arpa
but with --bogus-priv I get a local answer which never gets validated,
On Saturday 02 June 2018 15:48:58 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 May 2017 09:39:11 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 22 May 2017 23:11:02 Simon Kelley wrote:
> > > On 12/05/17 16:32, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Friday 12 May 2017 17:15:20 Simon Kelley wrote:
> > > >> There are so many layers of
On 31/05/18 11:50, Raphaël Halimi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two questions about authoritative mode.
>
> I have a home LAN, with a classic Bind / ISC DHCP / HPA TFTP setup
> (started long before dnsmasq ever existed).
>
> Recently I decided to rent a server to externalize some public services
>
Le 02/06/2018 à 19:39, Simon Kelley a écrit :
> This is just some security logic, since omiting auth-peer is allowed,
> and accepts AXFR requests from anywhere, AXFR is inhibited unless
> auth-sec-servers is specified. Otherwise, a dnsmasq instance without any
> secondary-server configuration
11 matches
Mail list logo
