On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:21:00PM +, Inigo de la Fuente wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a question regarding to DHCPv4 leases.
> Doing some tests I have faced a possible android issue
> that I want to share with you.
> 1.- I set the DHCP range of ipv4 address from 192.168.72.51 to
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 08:00:24PM -0200, Luis Kleber wrote:
> Em qui, 6 de dez de 2018 às 17:47, Brian Haley escreveu:
> > On 12/6/18 9:47 AM, Luis Kleber wrote:
> > > Last days I install 2 servers, one with Centos7 and other with Debian8,
> > > without Openstack/Neutron. Both with the same
> What became the URL of that bug report?
> Geert Stappers
> Leven en laten leven
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 05:59:11AM +, P, Sreelakshmi wrote:
> Hi All,
> Does anyone has any update on this?
is a good start.
For making it possible to read in the discussion order.
A malformed dhcp discover packet can cause dnsmasq to be unresponsive for a
small amount of time. If this was repeated over time an attacker could make
the dhcp service unresponsive DOSing the box.
Does dnsmasq validate the incoming DHCP packet? We are using v2.78. Are there
master has a build error when building without HAVE_DHCPv6
option.c: In function 'dhcp_context_free':
option.c:1042:15: error: 'struct dhcp_context' has no member named
Sadly, need to put in a little conditional compilation
I have a question regarding to DHCPv4 leases.
Doing some tests I have faced a possible android issue that I want to share
1.- I set the DHCP range of ipv4 address from 192.168.72.51 to 192.168.72.150
2.- One windows pc is connected and get an ipv4 lease
El 2018-12-06 15:56, Geert Stappers escribió:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 06:52:11PM +0100, john doe wrote:
On 12/6/2018 3:50 PM, jmperrote wrote:
dhcp-option=eth0,6,10.11.37.15 #dns primario
dhcp-option=eth0,1,255.255.255.0 # mascara de red