Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] REFUSED after dropped packets

2021-09-20 Thread Simon Kelley
On 20/09/2021 20:49, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > Hi, > > after recent update to 2.86 on Debian sid I'm seeing > failures in name resolution. I think the issue is that > my Wifi connection is currently flaky (another problem > to solve...) and the DNS reply gets lost. After that > dnsmasq

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] change in behavior where v4 address exists but not v6 in 2.86

2021-09-20 Thread Todd Derr
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 12:03 AM wrote: > In 2.86, there's a defined priority list for domains, so the behaviour > you want is easy to define > > address=/dummy.com/127.0.0.2 > local=/dummy.com/ > > thanks, that works fine for our purposes. also thanks for the explanation. I mentioned in

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH v2] Optimize inserting records into server list.

2021-09-20 Thread Simon Kelley
Applied, with a small addition. cleanup_servers() may end up deleting the last server in the chain, invalidating servers_tail, so recalculate it as part of the loop there. Cheers, Simon. On 19/09/2021 11:56, hev wrote: > Signed-off-by: hev > --- > src/dnsmasq.h | 2 +- >

[Dnsmasq-discuss] REFUSED after dropped packets

2021-09-20 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Hi, after recent update to 2.86 on Debian sid I'm seeing failures in name resolution. I think the issue is that my Wifi connection is currently flaky (another problem to solve...) and the DNS reply gets lost. After that dnsmasq reports REFUSED, e.g.: Sep 20 21:06:38 dnsmasq[18805]: 55