Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Nack requests for unknown leases.

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: > On 20/04/17 10:34, Alin Nastac wrote: >> Hosts that migrate from one network to another could request their >> old IP address which might be already in use by another statically >> configured host. Currently

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Nack requests for unknown leases.

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:43 PM, <wkitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/24/2017 05:16 AM, Alin Năstac wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Simon Kelley <si...@thekelleys.org.uk> >> wrote: >>> >>> When the client sends the discovery packet,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Nack requests for unknown leases.

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Simon Kelley <si...@thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: > On 24/04/17 10:16, Alin Năstac wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Simon Kelley <si...@thekelleys.org.uk> >> wrote: >>> On 20/04/17 10:34, Alin Nastac wrote: >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Nack requests for unknown leases.

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: > That's the bug here, I think. I was worried that a client sending a > DHCPDISCOVER when it thinks it knows that address, might respond to ICMP > pings, but at least for ISC dhclient on Linux, that's not the case. > >