).
So, for a second, dnsmasq could fall in a "prune loop" by doing:
* Not pruning anything, since difftime() is not > 0
* Run alarm again with zero as argument
On a server with very large number of leases and releasing often
sessions, that can waste a very big CPU time.
Signed-of
-by: Charles Daymand
Signed-off-by: Florent Fourcot
---
CHANGELOG| 4
man/dnsmasq.8| 6 ++
man/fr/dnsmasq.8 | 7 +++
src/dnsmasq.h| 3 ++-
src/option.c | 3 +++
src/rfc2131.c| 2 +-
6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/CHANGELOG b/CHANGELOG
Hello Simon,
Could you have a look on this patch? Please let me know if something is
missing, I'm ready to work on a v2.
Best regards,
Florent.
On 20/06/2019 10:26, Florent Fourcot wrote:
The idea of this option was already discussed years ago on the mailing
list:
https://dnsmasq
Hello Simon,
Of course, it involves enumerating the broken machines, rather than a
blanket setting covering everything, but that's probably a good thing.
It's what I wanted to provide with the tag extension I suggested, and
rather renders that redundant.
What do you thin Florent? Is this
Hello,
Currently ipset are filled with Linux netlink interface, so it's fast
and efficient (not like running an external command). ipset module is an
iptables extension, and is not supported by nftables.
nftables has built-in same functionality than ipset (no need of an
extension), and is
st regards,
--
Florent Fourcot.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
specific?
--
Florent Fourcot.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
cache DNS
entries longer than timeout specified above.
Should I maybe try to extend ipset-dns [1] instead of
dnsmasq?
[1] https://git.zx2c4.com/ipset-dns/
ipset-dns has same features (and limitations) than ipset dnsmasq option,
with a more complex architecture.
Best regards,
--
Flore
Hello,
You should have a look on ClearCache method of D-Bus interface, or
--clear-on-reload option (the second one is working only on specific use
cases)
Best regards,
--
Florent Fourcot.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss
Hello,
I can confirm that we suffered something maybe related on all recent
dnsmasq versions (I never tried with something older), since several
years (first seen in 2021, with a v2.86).
In our scenario, we had a lot of new/removed interfaces, and removing an
interface (and associated
10 matches
Mail list logo
