ses the NM testsuite to start
passing again.
Can anyone help shed some light please? Are we looking at a dnsmasq bug,
or something that our testsutie is doing wrong? If any more information
would be helpful then I'm more than happy to provide it.
Cheers all,
--
Iain Lane
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 01:06:30PM +, Iain Lane wrote:
> dnsmasq-dhcp[2010]: RTR-ADVERT(veth42) 2600::
>
> repeating over and over. You can view a log file including all the
> dnsmasq log entries at [2] - it's huge though, so I suggest downloading
> it and using a real text
param->newone = 1;
> }
> -
> - template->if_index = if_index;
> - template->local6 = *local;
> }
>
>}
>
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian De
Hi there,
Back at the desk now. All I can do are naive things, so here's some of
those (inline):
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 10:42:10PM +, Iain Lane wrote:
> Thanks Simon. I'm more or less offline for the holidays from now on, but
> I did test this and it didn't resolve the problem, I'm
follow up
very aggressively.
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2018q4/012709.html
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/405377161/dnsmasq_2.80-1_2.80-1ubuntu1.diff.gz
(the commit ID referenced in the changelog there seems or from
somewhere else, it's the same patch)
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane
been seen ...
How curious. Is there a vim keybinding to decrement a number that I
might have hit by mistake? (searched, yes, it's ctrl-x: TIL)
New one attached, thanks for the review!
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer
orever* now, but the intention of that commit is
that they were supposed to be one day (86400 seconds). I think maybe the
intention of the commit was this (attached)?
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer
and is it actually a problem? i.e. I'm wondering if
we should update the tests to not check for 'dynamic', or if a fix in
dnsmasq is needed instead.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la
