return), but I'd still like to understand the
behaviour from dnsmasq.
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 23:30, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 09:00:20PM +0000, John Robson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a library which I think has a bug, but this bug is affecting DNS
>
pture from yesterday shows that despite
the fact that the TTL had 2855 seconds (of the 3600 default) left just two
minutes before the first 'new process' request comes in, that new request
triggers an outbound query.
Cheers,
John
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 23:44, John Robson wrote:
> It is the id
Don’t think dnsmasq cares what order they are in, it tests them all and
chooses the fastest to use.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 16:00, Fox Haxx wrote:
> Let' say I have this config:
>
> server=
> server=
> resolv-file=/etc/dnsmasq-resolv.conf
> strict-order
>
> By running dnsmasq
__
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
>
--
*John Robson Sr. Customer Support Engineer**, Zenoss
<https://www.zenoss.com/>*
jrob...@zenoss.com | *O:*
<https://www.zenoss.com/resourc
have it, let me check...
Nope - I have that up to the dnsmasq restart, not the software restart.
Cheers,
John
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 16:27, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 30/03/2019 08:41, John Robson wrote:
> > Simon,
> >
> > The upstream server is authoritative for the initial dom
,
John
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 22:43, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 21/03/2019 11:01, John Robson wrote:
> > OK,
> >
> > Maybe this does reveal something about the caching...
> > Which might be expected behaviour, but I am not convinced it's useful...
> >
&
Does that not only apply to those in /etc/resolv.conf (or the overridden
file)
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 17:17, Fox Haxx wrote:
> > Don’t think dnsmasq cares what order they are in, it tests them all and
> chooses the fastest to use.
>
> By default, true, however, note I used the `strict-order`
their config, cloud systems get
very fast response times from google!
On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 18:24, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 08/02/2019 09:49, John Robson wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to understand the mechanism by which dnsmasq uses the
> > resolvers specified
some light on the issue.
Thoughts? debug hints? laughter?
Cheers,
John
--
*John Robson*
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Hi all,
I'm trying to understand the mechanism by which dnsmasq uses the resolvers
specified (in this case they are all specified in /etc/resolv.conf).
Specifically I am trying to work out why dnsmasq is (erratically) sending
the same query to multiple servers, and not listening beyond the first
10 matches
Mail list logo
