Dear List,
for dropping some dns request and redirect to another website
almost all the code is inside HAVE_GUARD macro
working version at (blacklist ok, white list is not working on current,
must backport to last stable):
https://code.google.com/p/dnsmasq-guard/
I am open to remark (what for
this is mot dnsmasq pb. use post up script for your iface. ;-)
best regards
On 2013-02-03 12:53 PM, Charles Cossé cco...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I have a computer configured as a router. eth0 is connected to
upstream and wlan0 is the target interface of dnsmasq. When dnsmasq
starts it
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.ukwrote:
On 13/02/13 22:17, C V wrote:
Sent: Wed, February 13, 2013 12:19:51 PM
Subject: [Dnsmasq-discuss] SIGHUP issue
The only 1 time I have been able to reproduce by hand is by trying it
on a
long-running
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:28 AM, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.ukwrote:
On 13/02/13 22:17, C V wrote:
Sent: Wed, February 13, 2013 12:19:51 PM
Subject: [Dnsmasq-discuss] SIGHUP issue
The only
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.uk
wrote:
It looks like the extra code is quite small, so I'd certainly consider
it.
Wonderful! I've extracted heavy lifting code into
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:30 PM, John Brendler brendle...@gmail.com
wrote:
I use ipsets and have written scripts for handling them dynamically.
I think this is a very interesting idea. I'd benefit from hearing some
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Kaspar Schleiser kas...@schleiser.dewrote:
Could you elaborate on how your tree works?
Went ahead and annotated the source:
you may look into the patch i send earlier
or look for dnsmasq-guard
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Bill Yuan byc...@gmail.com wrote:
I meant to configure an ip for all the nonexisting domain name, for
example, if the client is querying the google.com, it should get the
result, but when
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.ukwrote:
On 21/03/13 12:10, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Simon Kelley wrote:
Not specifically in reply to this, but some data.
i386, gcc -O2, not stripped, dnsmasq-2.66test23
without -DHAVE_IPSETbinary
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Simon Kelley si...@thekelleys.org.ukwrote:
http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/**dnsmasq/release-candidates/**
dnsmasq-2.66rc1.tar.gzhttp://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/release-candidates/dnsmasq-2.66rc1.tar.gz
For IPv4 users, there are not many changes, but IPv6,
Simon,
Beyond SIGUSR1 and 2
is there any way to communicate with dnsmasq to change the configuration
or ask statistics ?
Is it in development ?
Thanks again for dnsmasq,
Best regards.
--
/etc/hosts is prime
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:06 AM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Why is this such a giant hassle?
All I want to do is convert these three commands,
pdnsd-ctl add cname localhost radioscanningtw.jidanni.org 99
pdnsd-ctl record radioscanningtw.jidanni.org delete
openbsd 5.4: pkg_add libnettle (ew)
[make]
$ ./src/dnsmasq --version
Dnsmasq version 2.69rc1 Copyright (c) 2000-2014 Simon Kelley
Compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt no-DBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP
DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack no-ipset auth DNSSEC
Would you please explain why the
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:45 AM, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com
wrote:
openbsd 5.4: pkg_add libnettle (ew)
[make]
$ ./src/dnsmasq --version
Dnsmasq version 2.69rc1 Copyright (c) 2000-2014 Simon Kelley
Hello
Is it possible to enable the resolution of hostname given to the dhcp
server by clients ?
Best regards.
--
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\
dhcp-option-force=121,192.169.1.0/24,192.169.1.254,192.169.20.0/24,192.169.1.254,192.169.1.254,10.0.0.254
this is not sending the three routes when i test (i look inside the
tcpdump packet after 00 00fe)
always one
someone is using this ?
is /32 mandatory ?
--
16 matches
Mail list logo
