Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Remove DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 & DSA DNSSEC algorithm as this is set to status MUST NOT implement in RFC 8624

2020-02-27 Thread Simon Kelley
Looks sensible, I've pushed the equivalent, and removed the now-redundant DSA signature verification code too. Simon. On 24/02/2020 07:08, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > Google might mangle the patch. Feedback welcomed. > > RFC 8624 Section 3.1 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8624.txt )says

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Remove DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 & DSA DNSSEC algorithm as this is set to status MUST NOT implement in RFC 8624

2020-02-25 Thread Vladislav Grishenko
onday, February 24, 2020 12:08 PM To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk Subject: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Remove DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 & DSA DNSSEC algorithm as this is set to status MUST NOT implement in RFC 8624 Google might mangle the patch. Feedback welcomed. RFC 8624 Section 3.1 (https://www.rfc-e

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Remove DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 & DSA DNSSEC algorithm as this is set to status MUST NOT implement in RFC 8624

2020-02-23 Thread Loganaden Velvindron
Google might mangle the patch. Feedback welcomed. RFC 8624 Section 3.1 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8624.txt )says: 3 | DSA| MUST NOT| MUST NOT 6 | DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 | MUST NOT| MUST NOT I've added them on this gh repo: 1) Remove DSA-NSEC3-SHA