Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Remove DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 & DSA DNSSEC algorithm as this is set to status MUST NOT implement in RFC 8624

2020-02-27 Thread Simon Kelley
Looks sensible, I've pushed the equivalent, and removed the
now-redundant DSA signature verification code too.

Simon.



On 24/02/2020 07:08, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
> Google might mangle the patch. Feedback welcomed.
> 
> RFC 8624  Section 3.1 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8624.txt )says:
> 
> 3  | DSA| MUST NOT| MUST NOT
> 6  | DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 | MUST NOT| MUST NOT
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I've added them on this gh repo:
> 1) Remove DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 DNSSEC algorithm as this is set to
> status MUST NOT implement in RFC 8624:
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cyberstormdotmu/dnsmasq_dnssec_patches/master/0001-Remove-DSA-NSEC3-SHA1-DNSSEC-algorithm-as-this-is-se.patch
> 2) Remove DSA DNSSEC algorithm as this is set to status MUST
> NOT implement in RFC 8624:
> https://github.com/cyberstormdotmu/dnsmasq_dnssec_patches/blob/master/0002-Remove-DSA-DNSSEC-algorithm-as-this-is-set-to-status.patch
> 
> ___
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
> 


___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss


Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Remove DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 & DSA DNSSEC algorithm as this is set to status MUST NOT implement in RFC 8624

2020-02-25 Thread Vladislav Grishenko
Hi,

Have that since last year with possibility to reenable with HAVE_DNS build-time 
define:
https://github.com/themiron/dnsmasq/commit/5a1a8bc039561455677e825194f470219093aaf6.patch

Also, GOST is obsolete and GOST2012 is not standardized yet. This helps to turn 
it off by default:
https://github.com/themiron/dnsmasq/commit/a9ef96041fd0b594b662cbcb1a9b475844a4a5ab.patch

p.s Please ignore ctypto-openssl.c part, it's not part of official dnsmasq 
source.

Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko

-Original Message-
From: Dnsmasq-discuss  On 
Behalf Of Loganaden Velvindron
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 12:08 PM
To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Subject: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Remove DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 & DSA DNSSEC algorithm as this 
is set to status MUST NOT implement in RFC 8624

Google might mangle the patch. Feedback welcomed.

RFC 8624  Section 3.1 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8624.txt )says:

3  | DSA| MUST NOT| MUST NOT
6  | DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 | MUST NOT| MUST NOT




I've added them on this gh repo:
1) Remove DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 DNSSEC algorithm as this is set to status MUST NOT 
implement in RFC 8624:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cyberstormdotmu/dnsmasq_dnssec_patches/master/0001-Remove-DSA-NSEC3-SHA1-DNSSEC-algorithm-as-this-is-se.patch
2) Remove DSA DNSSEC algorithm as this is set to status MUST NOT implement in 
RFC 8624:
https://github.com/cyberstormdotmu/dnsmasq_dnssec_patches/blob/master/0002-Remove-DSA-DNSSEC-algorithm-as-this-is-set-to-status.patch

___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss


___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss


[Dnsmasq-discuss] Remove DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 & DSA DNSSEC algorithm as this is set to status MUST NOT implement in RFC 8624

2020-02-23 Thread Loganaden Velvindron
Google might mangle the patch. Feedback welcomed.

RFC 8624  Section 3.1 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8624.txt )says:

3  | DSA| MUST NOT| MUST NOT
6  | DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 | MUST NOT| MUST NOT




I've added them on this gh repo:
1) Remove DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 DNSSEC algorithm as this is set to
status MUST NOT implement in RFC 8624:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cyberstormdotmu/dnsmasq_dnssec_patches/master/0001-Remove-DSA-NSEC3-SHA1-DNSSEC-algorithm-as-this-is-se.patch
2) Remove DSA DNSSEC algorithm as this is set to status MUST
NOT implement in RFC 8624:
https://github.com/cyberstormdotmu/dnsmasq_dnssec_patches/blob/master/0002-Remove-DSA-DNSSEC-algorithm-as-this-is-set-to-status.patch

___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss