You're right. Apologies for letting that slip through.
Patch applied.
Cheers,
Simon.
On 06/02/18 08:10, yiwenchen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found that dnsmasq doesn't reply dhcpv6 relay-forward packets after
> applying the patch of CVE-2017-14494.
> It seems like the boundary check in the patch is wrong.
>
> The following commit should fix the problem.
> Could you please help confirm the issue?
> Thank you very much.
>
>
> ---
> src/rfc3315.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/rfc3315.c b/src/rfc3315.c
> index c3c1c95..99b310a 100644
> --- a/src/rfc3315.c
> +++ b/src/rfc3315.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int dhcp6_maybe_relay(struct state *state,
> void *inbuff, size_t sz,
>
> for (opt = opts; opt; opt = opt6_next(opt, end))
> {
> - if (opt6_ptr(opt, 0) + opt6_len(opt) >= end) {
> + if (opt6_ptr(opt, 0) + opt6_len(opt) > end) {
> return 0;
> }
> int o = new_opt6(opt6_type(opt));
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> Best Regards,
> Yiwen
>
>
>
> ___
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
>
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss