Am 10.04.2019 um 23:56 schrieb Simon Kelley:
> If Harmut's config is unique, and works without openWRT talking to both
> dnsmasq instances, then the solution may be just to turn off ubus on one
> of the dnsmasq instances.
I don't know what openwrt does with the dnsmasq data on ubus. I did turn
On 4/10/19 12:55 PM, Jan Willem Janssen wrote:
There's one solution I can think of: making the name under which we register
the UBus object configurable (with "dnsmasq" as default for backwards
compatibility). It would allow multiple instances to be configured each with
their own unique name.
On 10/04/2019 17:55, Jan Willem Janssen wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 20:41 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
>>> I've to give it some thought about how we could support multiple Dnsmasq
>>> instances in
>>> combination with UBus. Not sure how the DBus implementation would handle
>>> this...
>>
>>
On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 20:41 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> > I've to give it some thought about how we could support multiple Dnsmasq
> > instances in
> > combination with UBus. Not sure how the DBus implementation would handle
> > this...
>
> It doesn't: the path is a compile-time parameter.
>
On 4/8/19 3:58 PM, wkitt...@gmail.com wrote:
is there some ID or signature that could be used to differentiate between
separate dnsmasq instances? if so, one could specify that in the config and that
could be used with dbus to separate the instances and how they communicate...
i mixed up
On 4/8/19 1:52 PM, Jan Willem Janssen wrote:
I've to give it some thought about how we could support multiple Dnsmasq
instances in combination with UBus. Not sure how the DBus implementation
would handle this...
is there some ID or signature that could be used to differentiate between
>
> I've to give it some thought about how we could support multiple Dnsmasq
> instances in
> combination with UBus. Not sure how the DBus implementation would handle
> this...
It doesn't: the path is a compile-time parameter.
It's not clear that the entities on the other end of the UBus
Hi,
On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 16:24 +0200, e9hack wrote:
> From the first I see:
> daemon.info dnsmasq[1808]: Connected to system UBus
> daemon.info dnsmasq[1808]: UBus support enabled: connected to system bus
>
> From the second I see:
> daemon.err dnsmasq[1809]: Cannot add object to UBus: Invalid
@Jan?
(I suspect that nothing has changed, except that a previously silent
error is now no longer silent, but it would be nice to confirm this, and
maybe explicitly consider this case.)
Simon
On 08/04/2019 15:24, e9hack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the latest dnsmasq version with openwrt.
Hi,
I'm using the latest dnsmasq version with openwrt. There are two instances
running. One provides dhcpv4, dhcpv6 and dns
to several networks, the other one dhcpv4 to one network only. It looks like,
that the second instance has a problem
with ubus:
Sun Apr 7 18:37:34 2019 daemon.info
10 matches
Mail list logo
