> From: Petr Mensik
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 3:01 PM
> To: Vladislav Grishenko ;
> dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Issues with TCP queries on recreated
> interfaces.
>
> Hi Vladislav
>
> On 7/9/19 10:00 PM,
; selected.
>> At the other hand, with no __attribute__((warn_unused_result)) it will not
>> generate warning anyway.
>>
>> Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Petr Mensik
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019
.
> At the other hand, with no __attribute__((warn_unused_result)) it will not
> generate warning anyway.
>
> Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Petr Mensik
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 3:01 PM
> To: Vladislav Grishenko ;
>
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Issues with TCP queries on recreated
interfaces.
Hi Vladislav
On 7/9/19 10:00 PM, Vladislav Grishenko wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> Regarding 0002-Compare-address-and-interface-index-for-allowed-inte.patch,
> does it support case with different valid
Hi Vladislav
On 7/9/19 10:00 PM, Vladislav Grishenko wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> Regarding 0002-Compare-address-and-interface-index-for-allowed-inte.patch,
> does it support case with different valid interfaces with the same address?
> For example:
> eth0 192.168.1.1/24
> tun0
Hi Petr,
Regarding 0002-Compare-address-and-interface-index-for-allowed-inte.patch, does
it support case with different valid interfaces with the same address?
For example:
eth0 192.168.1.1/24
tun0 192.168.1.1./16 (created/destroyed dynamically)
Regarding appearance, seems newly
