On 21/05/16 11:53, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Good to know, and thanks for looking.
>
> I took a false positive into account especially on the FreeBSD 9.3
> warnings that are gone on 10.1; FreeBSD 9.3 uses a pretty old GCC
> version ("cc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]", ISTR it branched
>
Am 20.05.2016 um 23:03 schrieb Simon Kelley:
> Apologies for jumping the gun on you. As a general thing, a quick email
> in reply to an rc1 announcement is enough to hold things until an issue
> has been addressed.
>
> I checked those warnings, and they're all false positives. The static
>
Apologies for jumping the gun on you. As a general thing, a quick email
in reply to an rc1 announcement is enough to hold things until an issue
has been addressed.
I checked those warnings, and they're all false positives. The static
analysis is clever, but not clever enough.
This release of
Am 18.05.2016 um 17:44 schrieb Simon Kelley:
> I've just released dnsmasq 2.76.
>
> Download from http://thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-2.76.tar.gz
>
> It's more than nine months since the last release, so get the new code
> quick, there's lots to go at.
Hi Simon,
that was fast after the
> I've just pushed 2.76rc1 to the usual places.
Wait for pl.po! :-)
(tomorrow night I'll prepare it)
--
jasiu
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss