On 20/03/2020 14:29, William Edwards wrote:
>> This sounds like a bug, doing auth DNS without an auth-server statement
>> is a recent addition, and I probably forgot this effect on secondary
>> servers. Will take a look in the next day or two.
>
> No worries. What's important to me is that only
> This sounds like a bug, doing auth DNS without an auth-server statement
> is a recent addition, and I probably forgot this effect on secondary
> servers. Will take a look in the next day or two.
No worries. What's important to me is that only entries in 'auth-sec-servers'
are returned as NS
This sounds like a bug, doing auth DNS without an auth-server statement
is a recent addition, and I probably forgot this effect on secondary
servers. Will take a look in the next day or two.
Simon.
On 20/03/2020 08:25, William Edwards wrote:
>
>> Op 20 mrt. 2020 om 00:23 heeft Simon Kelley
> Op 20 mrt. 2020 om 00:23 heeft Simon Kelley het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>> On 19/03/2020 17:23, William Edwards wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have auth-sec-servers set to:
>> 'auth-sec-servers=nsauth0.cyberfusion.nl,nsauth1.cyberfusion.be,nsauth2.cyberfusion.nu,nsauth3.cyberfusion.nl'
>>
>> These
On 19/03/2020 17:23, William Edwards wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have auth-sec-servers set to:
> 'auth-sec-servers=nsauth0.cyberfusion.nl,nsauth1.cyberfusion.be,nsauth2.cyberfusion.nu,nsauth3.cyberfusion.nl'
>
> These nameservers are shown, but I am also getting back an NS record
> consisting of '.':
>
