Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question about the behavior of options 66 and 67

2018-07-30 Thread Shankar Unni
> On Jul 25, 2018, at 1:35 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: > > I think is you specify dhcp boot and dhcp-bo-override and dhcp-option > fro 66 and 67 then the data will always be sent in the bootp fields, and > will be sent as options if requested. Experiment needed to be sure. > > > Like a lot of DHCP

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question about the behavior of options 66 and 67

2018-07-25 Thread Simon Kelley
On 25/07/18 19:03, Shankar Unni wrote: > Thanks, Simon! > > I did discover this and figured out that we can specify it as —dhcp-boot=… > and —dhcp-no-override. But then these options will ALWAYS only be sent as > bootp fields, right? > > Will there be an issue the other way, then? (I.e. som

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question about the behavior of options 66 and 67

2018-07-25 Thread Shankar Unni
Thanks, Simon! I did discover this and figured out that we can specify it as —dhcp-boot=… and —dhcp-no-override. But then these options will ALWAYS only be sent as bootp fields, right? Will there be an issue the other way, then? (I.e. some client that sends in options 66/67 in parameter requ

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question about the behavior of options 66 and 67

2018-07-25 Thread Simon Kelley
This dnsmasq configuration is relevant: --dhcp-no-override (IPv4 only) Disable re-use of the DHCP servername and filename fields as extra option space. If it can, dnsmasq moves the boot server and filename information (from --dhcp-boot) out of their dedicated fields