The testing is on a single device, where the MAC address is the same
for both vlan9 and vlan19. Hence, the release packet is reaching the
server.
Looking for your help to root cause the issue.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
The testing is on a single device, where MAC address is the same for
both vlan9 and vlan19.
Hence, the release packet is reaching to server." ?
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 2:05 AM wrote:
> On 8/9/23 10:58 AM, shashikumar Shashi wrote:
> > 2) Put the client on vlan9. Client gets IP from vlan9 pool
On 8/9/23 10:58 AM, shashikumar Shashi wrote:
2) Put the client on vlan9. Client gets IP from vlan9 pool (e.g. 192.168.9.10)
by executing “dhclient -4 eth1”.
3) Put the same client on vlan19. Client releases previously acquired IP (e.g.
192.168.9.10) by executing “dhclient -4 eth1 -r”.
4)
Hi,
“
*Acknowledge on "Client moves".* *The 'releases IP' is probably*
*something like "I'm unaware that IP stands for Internet Protocol*
*and want to try how far I can get by being vague how the release*
*of the DHCP lease was done"*
—>
Client is executing “dhclient -4 eth1 -r” to release
On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 01:24:02AM +0300, 0zl wrote:
> On 8/4/23 09:24, shashikumar Shashi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Observing that dnsmasq is offering DHCP IP to the client
} } Observing that dnsmasq is offering DHCP IP-address to the client
> > from a vlan pool which is in DOWN state.
> >
> >
I've encountered this issue as well, I ended up working around it by
creating bridges that have those vlans as their bridge port. This way
the bridge stays up to dnsmasq even when I take one of these vlans down.
On 8/4/23 09:24, shashikumar Shashi wrote:
Hi,
Observing that dnsmasq (version
Hello,
I can confirm that we suffered something maybe related on all recent
dnsmasq versions (I never tried with something older), since several
years (first seen in 2021, with a v2.86).
In our scenario, we had a lot of new/removed interfaces, and removing an
interface (and associated
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 02:20:05PM +0530, shashikumar Shashi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 1:20 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 11:54:15AM +0530, shashikumar Shashi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Observing that dnsmasq (version 2.80) is offering DHCP IP to the client
> >
The issue is seen even after porting the latest Dnsmasq version 2.89 also.
Thanks,
Shashi
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 1:20 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 11:54:15AM +0530, shashikumar Shashi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Observing that dnsmasq (version 2.80) is offering DHCP IP to
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 11:54:15AM +0530, shashikumar Shashi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Observing that dnsmasq (version 2.80) is offering DHCP IP to the client
> If dnsmasq is rebuilt by commenting out the following code block from
> dhcp_reply function, then in the above case, dnsmasq offers IP
10 matches
Mail list logo
