Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] using DHCP to set clients' MTU

2008-09-15 Thread Adam Hardy
Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert on 12/09/08 12:53, wrote: Adam Hardy wrote: Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert on 11/09/08 21:17, wrote: [snip] Hmmm, a mtu of 1430 looks a bit strange, but propably depends on your link. Some kind of VPN or PPPoA on your side? Or are you saying paypal has some kind of

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] using DHCP to set clients' MTU

2008-09-12 Thread Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert
Adam Hardy wrote: Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert on 11/09/08 21:17, wrote: [snip] Hmmm, a mtu of 1430 looks a bit strange, but propably depends on your link. Some kind of VPN or PPPoA on your side? Or are you saying paypal has some kind of Tunnel/Route/Whatever which limits THEIR mtu? In an

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] using DHCP to set clients' MTU

2008-09-12 Thread Grant Coady
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:53:28 +0200, Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert redbu...@cc.hs-owl.de wrote: ... I think 1430 is one of those optimised values, and 1458 maybe still to big for pppoa, but i'm not sure. Did you tried 1454 1452? I think it's something with 145[0-9] from what i read. Or is BT

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] using DHCP to set clients' MTU

2008-09-11 Thread Adam Hardy
Steven Jan Springl on 11/09/08 15:20, wrote: On Thursday 11 September 2008 14:08, Adam Hardy wrote: Hi, searched the archives and the net and was surprised not to see any hits for MTU except its generic appearance in log statements. I had to change my MTU on my workstations to1430 to get SMTP

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] using DHCP to set clients' MTU

2008-09-11 Thread Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert
Adam Hardy wrote: Steven Jan Springl on 11/09/08 15:20, wrote: On Thursday 11 September 2008 14:08, Adam Hardy wrote: Hi, searched the archives and the net and was surprised not to see any hits for MTU except its generic appearance in log statements. I had to change my MTU on my workstations