Dean Anderson wrote:
It seems obvious, that when faced with significant problems in the
current approach, it is relevant to consider whether that approach still
makes sense.
Blindly continuing a practice merely because it was done before is the
essense of foolhardiness. [I suspect that should be attributed to
someone, but I can't think who]
Most relevant quote I know:
"It is revolting to have no better reason for a rule of law than that so
it was laid down in the time of Henry IV. It is still more revolting if
the grounds upon which it was laid down have vanished long since, and
the rule simply persists from blind imitation of the past". Oliver
Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law
- Kevin
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
