All,
It seems that after delivering my presentation on subsequent AS112
delegations in Quebec City, I hadn't recalled what the group thought about
adopting this work as a dnsop item. So, I'm soliciting feedback on this
request. I have posted version 03 for your consideration.
Thanks,
On 2012-04-04, at 08:20, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
It seems that after delivering my presentation on subsequent AS112
delegations in Quebec City, I hadn't recalled what the group thought about
adopting this work as a dnsop item. So, I'm soliciting feedback on this
request.
On 2012-04-04 12:20 PM, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
It seems that after delivering my presentation on subsequent AS112
delegations in Quebec City, I hadn't recalled what the group thought
about adopting this work as a dnsop item. So, I'm soliciting feedback
on this request. I have
Joe Abley joe.ab...@icann.org wrote:
On 2012-04-04, at 11:31, Tony Finch wrote:
I think BIND treats NXDOMAIN replies with the wrong authority as a
FORMERR. Domainers are returning positive replies which BIND does not
subject to a SOA sanity check.
[real test]
All other nameservers gave
After a long delay, I have revisited the
DNSSEC Operational Practices, Version 2 I-D and performed
a full review from scratch for the most recent draft version,
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-10.
For convenience, and to accommodate message size limitations,
I have split my review comments into 3
