On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:55:36PM -1000, Tim WIcinski wrote:
DNSOP WG,
This starts a call for adoption for draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies.
The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies/
Please review this draft to see if you think it is
Support
Mehmet
On Nov 13, 2014, at 4:55 PM, Tim WIcinski tjw.i...@gmail.com wrote:
DNSOP WG,
This starts a call for adoption for draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies.
The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies/
Please review this draft
Registration is now open for the 2014 Workshop on DNS Future Root
Service Architecture (2014 WDFRSA)
Location: Hong Kong, HK
Venue: The Mira Hotel (Kowloon district)
Date: December 8-9, 2014
Hosted by: ISOC-HK
Sponsors: ZDNS/BII and CNNIC
Co-chairs: Warren Kumari and Paul Vixie
This two
what is the url for workshop registration?
mehmet
On Nov 13, 2014, at 11:14 PM, Paul Vixie p...@redbarn.org wrote:
Registration is now open for the 2014 Workshop on DNS Future Root Service
Architecture (2014 WDFRSA)
Location: Hong Kong, HK
Venue: The Mira Hotel (Kowloon district)
Mehmet Akcin mailto:meh...@akcin.net
Friday, November 14, 2014 1:18 AM
what is the url for workshop registration?
no url was given except for the hotel. to register for the conference
itself, you have to send e-mail. hereis:
On Nov 13, 2014, at 11:14 PM, Paul Vixie p...@redbarn.org
So I have adjusted the configuration on my workstation's name server to
include the global root servers (for robustness) as well as a local
stealth slave (for low latency). Here's a count of queries directed at the
root zone and the servers chosen to handle them. I wonder how different it
would be
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:26:22PM -0800, Paul Vixie wrote:
i don't know how to answer your discomfort. as you know i was
responsible for f-root's anycast growth for many years; as you may not
know i was responsible for as112's early growth after a bill manning
experiment succeeded.
AS112
Evan Hunt mailto:e...@isc.org
Friday, November 14, 2014 10:33 AM
...
I believe there's more scope for an incompetent or malicious root server
operator to block, surveil, or deceive me, and while there are defenses I
can deploy against some misbehaviors, I think we need to be cautious
Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net writes:
We are requesting a call for adoption of
draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback.
Support adopting, but we will need to talk about careful wording of when
to use it and when not to.
--
Wes Hardaker
Parsons
___
Hi,
On Nov 14, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Evan Hunt e...@isc.org wrote:
AS112 absolutely proves that unowned anycast can work at scale;
I think AS112 is a red herring: it doesn't prove anything that wasn't already
known ages ago (i.e., BGP works).
I believe a better (still not perfect) analogy would
+1
On Nov 13, 2014, at 23:32, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote:
On Nov 13, 2014, at 11:20 AM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote:
Dear DNSOP Chairs,
We are requesting a call for adoption of draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback.
Support.
Regards,
-drc
In message 19b42657-aed1-440e-8300-996915a28...@virtualized.org, David Conrad
writes:
Hi,
On Nov 14, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Evan Hunt e...@isc.org wrote:
AS112 absolutely proves that unowned anycast can work at scale;
I think AS112 is a red herring: it doesn't prove anything that wasn't
Hi,
AS112 absolutely proves that unowned anycast can work at scale; that's not
my concern. But if my neighbor announces a route to the AS112 addresses,
and then misconfigures a server, fills it with lies, or logs all my
queries, the practical effect on me is pretty small: the worst case
scenario
David Conrad mailto:d...@virtualized.org
Friday, November 14, 2014 1:10 PM
Hi,
I think AS112 is a red herring: it doesn't prove anything that wasn't
already known ages ago (i.e., BGP works).
I believe a better (still not perfect) analogy would be 6to4 and I'd
refer to the discussion
i think we're about to enter a non-discuss period for scalingroot-XX,
yet this message touches other topics.
Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry) mailto:wolfgang.nag...@ausregistry.com.au
Friday, November 14, 2014 1:48 PM
Hi,
One of my biggest concerns about the current proposal is that it seems
In message 000e7a4f-6391-4842-b2ed-2a28b8d3e...@virtualized.org, David Conrad
writes:
Mark,
On Nov 14, 2014, at 11:19 AM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
I believe a better (still not perfect) analogy would be 6to4
6to4 has asymetric routing 99.9% of the time,
99.9% of all
tjw This starts a call for adoption for draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies.
[...]
tjw Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for
tjw adoption by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your
tjw view.
+1 to adopt and can review if needed.
It's another useful tool to have
warren We are requesting a call for adoption of
warren draft-wkumari-dnsop-root-loopback.
Support.
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Action Items
Here is a summary from the minutes for the DNSOP meeting on action items
for everything that has been discussed.
These will start going out every few days, to not overwhelm the group
nor the chairs.
If anyone objects please speak up.
Thanks,
tim and suzanne
-
Call for
Colleagues,
This call for adoption closed earlier this week, during IETF91.
We see significant support in the WG for working on
draft-vandergaast-dnsop-edns-client-subnet. We're adopting it as a WG item.
Thanks to the authors for reviving it, please resubmit with any changes you
have
This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis
The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis/
Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly
Tim Wicinski mailto:tjw.i...@gmail.com
Friday, November 14, 2014 4:04 PM
This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis
The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis/
Please review this draft to see if you think it
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 02:04:43PM -1000,
Tim Wicinski tjw.i...@gmail.com wrote
a message of 24 lines which said:
This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis
I believe TCP for DNS is very important, both to handle reflection
attacks and cache poisoning attempts, and
On Nov 14, 2014, at 2:04 PM, Tim Wicinski tjw.i...@gmail.com wrote:
This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis
The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis/
Please review this draft to see if you think it
24 matches
Mail list logo
