> valid point, however with respect to 6761 the onion namespace
> substantially predates the existence of 6761 or the consensus documented
> there so I don't think the what if scenario is particularly helpful
Indeed, and Stephen pointed that out to me privately as well. That
was a mistake in my r
On 8/21/15 2:40 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure I'll be a yes ballot on this (after I re-read the
>> draft which I've not read for quite a while). And I don't expect
>> either of us to change our ballot, but that said, I hope you don't
>> mind explaining your ballot a little more since I'
> I'm pretty sure I'll be a yes ballot on this (after I re-read the
> draft which I've not read for quite a while). And I don't expect
> either of us to change our ballot, but that said, I hope you don't
> mind explaining your ballot a little more since I'm not getting part
> of your argument and t
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https:/
Hiya,
I'm pretty sure I'll be a yes ballot on this (after I re-read the
draft which I've not read for quite a while). And I don't expect
either of us to change our ballot, but that said, I hope you don't
mind explaining your ballot a little more since I'm not getting part
of your argument and tha
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: Abstain
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https:/
