Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-woodworth-bulk-rr-00.txt

> On Nov 2, 2015, at 12:28 AM, Woodworth, John R > wrote: > > See inline comments: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Edward Lewis [mailto:edward.le...@icann.org >> ] >> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] discussion for

Re: [DNSOP] Asking TLD's to perform checks.

Moin! On 8 Nov 2015, at 0:52, Mark Andrews wrote: > Fixing misimplementations of the protocol is different to fixing > misconfiguration of servers. The draft is aimed primarially at > fixing misimplementations rather than misconfigurations though both > need fixing. Sorry I over generalised. To

Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-ogud-dnsop-maintain-ds in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

>> * Perhaps "Accept with challenge" should provide some advice on how >> this works. For example, a TXT record with a unique key for each zone >> (or customer) seems like a good recommendation. It might also make >> sense if each child domain (or customer) has a unique ownername to >> look

Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-ogud-dnsop-maintain-ds in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

> On Nov 5, 2015, at 9:55 PM, Shane Kerr wrote: > > Dear dnsop working group, > > On Thu, 05 Nov 2015 17:20:18 -0800 > IETF Secretariat wrote: > >> The DNSOP WG has placed draft-ogud-dnsop-maintain-ds in state >> Candidate for WG