Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-ogud-dnsop-maintain-ds in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

2015-11-17 Thread Jacques Latour
> -Original Message- > From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jan Vcelák > Sent: November-08-15 3:50 PM > To: Olafur Gudmundsson; Shane Kerr > Cc: dnsop@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-ogud-dnsop-maintain-ds > in state "Candidate for WG

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query-05.txt

2015-11-17 Thread Paul Wouters
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Mark Andrews wrote: This example as the wrong length unless you want every from wire reader to be re-written to not look for the root label. Given the comment about no compression pointers this should be wire format not text format. "com." has length 0x05 (0x03

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query-05.txt

2015-11-17 Thread Paul Wouters
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Mark Andrews wrote: A DNS query that contains the CHAIN option MUST also have the DNSSEC OK ("OK") bit set. If this bit is not set, or if the Checking Disabled ("CD") bit is set, the CHAIN option received MUST be ignored. Why disabled on CD=1? If you have the

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query-05.txt

2015-11-17 Thread Mark Andrews
A DNS query that contains the CHAIN option MUST also have the DNSSEC OK ("OK") bit set. If this bit is not set, or if the Checking Disabled ("CD") bit is set, the CHAIN option received MUST be ignored. Why disabled on CD=1? If you have the contents cached and validated already what

Re: [DNSOP] comments on draft-jabley-dnsop-refuse-any-01

2015-11-17 Thread 神明達哉
At Mon, 02 Nov 2015 11:47:26 -0500, "Joe Abley" wrote: > > - Section 3 > > > > ANY queries are sometimes used to help mine authoritative-only DNS > > servers for zone data, since they return all RRSets for a particular > > owner name. A DNS zone maintainer might prefer

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query

2015-11-17 Thread Tim Wicinski
The time for the WGLC has ended, and while there is some contention, there is also rough consensus to move this document forward. I will point the IESG to the mail thread about the issue Tony raised in the shepherd writeup. IANA and given chain-query the EDNS Option Code of 13. Paul has