The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7871,
"Client Subnet in DNS Queries".
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7871&eid=4736
--
Type: Editorial
Reported
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7871,
"Client Subnet in DNS Queries".
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7871&eid=4735
--
Type: Technical
Reported
Badly worded of mine... Firewalls drop/dropped EDNS0 packets which was the
core issue
-éric
On 07/07/16 03:35, "Ray Bellis" wrote:
>
>
>On 07/07/2016 10:31, Benoit Claise wrote:
>
>> Based on my operational experience, I have seen multiple DNSSEC
>> packets dropped by firewalls because they try
> From: "Jiankang Yao"
>>* My idea
>
>> I prefer multiple query sections (with some restrictions)
>> and merged answers.
>
>> multiple query examples may be
>>NAME A + NAME + MX
>>NAME A + NAME + _443._tcp.NAME TLSA
>>NAME A + NAME + _sip._udp.NAME SRV + _sips._tcp.
On 07/07/2016 10:31, Benoit Claise wrote:
> Based on my operational experience, I have seen multiple DNSSEC
> packets dropped by firewalls because they try to use EDNS0 rather
> than fragmenting. Does your I-D also address this issue?
This is the wrong way around - EDNS *relies upon* fragmentat
Regarding the format of EXTRA RRs, it's better to use a list of RRs rather
than a list embedded in one RR. And a single label isn't enough, e.g.
TLSA.
So I suggest the presentation format should be like
EXTRA typename.
and the wire format should be a 16 bit type followed by an unco
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Hi Bob,
inline
On 6 July 2016 at 01:17, Bob Harold wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:51 AM, IETF Secretariat <
> ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> The DNSOP WG has placed draft-song-dns-wireformat-http in state
>> Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Tim Wicinski)
>>
>> The doc