In article <7d49542b-1852-464a-b3f0-198357dc1...@nic.fr> you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
> This is relevant to the Special-Use registry discussion. (Which is mentioned,
> in a negative way.)
>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20170312_and_the_wait_continues_for_corp_home_and_mail_applicants/
It is my impress
draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-03 includes revised text to address issues raised
during the WG last call and other editorial improvements. The list of issues,
discussion and resolution are in GitHub:
https://github.com/Abhayakara/draft-tldr-sutld-ps
There is one substantial addition to the list of
Jakob,
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 09:04:53AM +0100, Jakob Schlyter wrote:
> This draft should be of interest to this WG, providing an alternative to
> draft-wouters-sury-dnsop-algorithm-update.
>
> jakob
>
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arends-dnsop-dnssec-algorithm-update-00
This i
This draft should be of interest to this WG, providing an alternative to
draft-wouters-sury-dnsop-algorithm-update.
jakob
Forwarded message:
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
To: Roy Arends , Jakob Schlyter
, Matt Larson
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-arends-dnsop-dnssec
