On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:36 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <
jordi.pa...@consulintel.es> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve posted “Towards a Worldwide IPv6-Ready DNS Infrastructure”
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palet-sunset4-ipv6-ready-dns/
>
> I believe this is covered by the charter of sunset4,
Joe Abley wrote:
Hi Paul,
...
I presume you mean existing, not extant. ...
yes. thanks for understanding what i mean in spite of what i said.
The principal challenges I have seen using a non-trivial transfer
graph with NOTIFY and [AI]XFR are when a pair of candidate masters for a
By the way, forgot to mention something else.
I’ve started also to work in a policy proposal for ICANN in order to make sure
that we get aligned.
Regards,
Jordi
-Mensaje original-
De: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Fecha: viernes, 24 de noviembre de 2017, 21:36
Hi,
I’ve posted “Towards a Worldwide IPv6-Ready DNS Infrastructure”
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palet-sunset4-ipv6-ready-dns/
I believe this is covered by the charter of sunset4, however, it is very
relevant as well for a recent discussion in 6man and v6ops and of course, it is
Hi Paul,
On 23 Nov 2017, at 13:48, Paul Vixie wrote:
> Joe Abley wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> Feeding a large array of slaves (eg hundreds, including individual
>> members if clusters) with large numbers of zones from a single master
>> doesn't scale very well.
>
> when i had to do
I would like to see this draft adopted and worked on by the WG. Some of
Ed's observations ring true for me as well, but I can see ways forward
for all the ones that concern me.
--Paul Hoffman
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
I support adoption and will review the draft.
-- Benno
On 11/16/2017 09:23 AM, tjw ietf wrote:
> All
>
> The author has rolled out a new version addressing comments from the
> meeting on Monday, and we feel it’s ready to move this along.
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for