On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 07:42:36PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> But that requires a new "XNAME" rrtype, whereas what the users want
> is a more flexible CNAME that coëxists with other RRtypes.
Ah. I didn't understand that you were proposing to reuse the CNAME
rrtype for this.
I think it would
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 07:43:19PM -0700, Joe Abley wrote:
> > Yes, but if they have the NSEC bitmap, they can follow the XNAME
> > without asking again.
> > [...]
> > That's already handled by NSEC/NSEC3.
>
> I think a pragmatic solution needs to work in unsigned zones.
For unsigned zones a
