In article
you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>If y'all care what gets published in a TLD, please take a look at
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd/
>which is an experimental draft that will go into WGLC last call soon.
>This was driven by wanting to add _dmarc records
>into TLDs, per
Dear David C Lawrence, Warren Ace Kumari, Puneet Sood:
An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled Serving
Stale Data to Improve DNS Resiliency (draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale) was
submitted to the IETF Secretariat on and has been posted on the "IETF Page
of Intellectual
Dear David C Lawrence, Warren Ace Kumari, Puneet Sood:
An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled Serving
Stale Data to Improve DNS Resiliency (draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale) was
submitted to the IETF Secretariat on and has been posted on the "IETF Page
of Intellectual
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 at 19:36, Nick Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 2:21 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:38:11PM +1200,
>> Nick Johnson wrote
>> a message of 173 lines which said:
>>
>> > Indeed - it's my understanding that ICANN forbids publishing
If y'all care what gets published in a TLD, please take a look at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd/
which is an experimental draft that will go into WGLC last call soon.
This was driven by wanting to add _dmarc records
into TLDs, per ICANN rules it needs to be an RFC.
Tim
