Re: [DNSOP] valid value range for SOA REFRESH/RETRY/EXPIRE

2019-10-18 Thread 神明達哉
At Fri, 18 Oct 2019 10:49:40 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > one obvious interpretation is that REFRESH/RETRY/EXPIRE are signed 32 > > > > bit integers. > > > > > > They are all intervals. How do you have a negative interval? > > > > I actually didn't expect they can be negative. My main

[DNSOP] Save the date: ICANN DNS Symposium (IDS) 2020

2019-10-18 Thread Matt Larson
[cid:2C03D4CD-467D-4E8D-8041-FCA94EDEECEB] Dear colleagues, It is my pleasure to invite you to save the date for our fourth ICANN DNS Symposium (IDS 2020), to be held 7-8 May 2020 in Paris, France at the Paris Marriott Rive Gauche Hotel & Conference

Re: [DNSOP] valid value range for SOA REFRESH/RETRY/EXPIRE

2019-10-18 Thread Kevin Darcy
[ Classification Level: PUBLIC ] Sorry, I misread the thread. I thought it was for all values in the SOA. RFC 1982 is specific to only the serial, not relevant to REFRESH/RETRY/EXPIRE. Not enough caffeine... - Kevin On Fri, Oct 18,

Re: [DNSOP] valid value range for SOA REFRESH/RETRY/EXPIRE

2019-10-18 Thread Kevin Darcy
[ Classification Level: PUBLIC ] Apologies if this sounds condescending, but I haven't seen RFC 1982 mentioned in this thread so far. While that RFC may not be the last word on the acceptable values of SOA.SERIAL, in normal operation, it does contain some advice on how to effectuate (or avoid) a