Dear DNSOP,
Following working group feedback on the -01 version, the draft has been updated
to reflect the following changes:
1) Whereas previously the Digest Type field conveyed only the hashing algorithm
to be used, now the Digest Type also conveys how the hash value is constructed
from the
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Message Digest for DNS Zones
Authors : Duane Wessels
Piet Barber
IIRC Ben Schwartz at the mic (Prague? Montreal?) mentioned he was
interested in seeing something like "traceroute but for DNS", which (a) is
what your described scenario sounds like to me and (b) is a
separate objective from this draft. I think it's just...unrelated. I
don't think we have DNS
I was quite surprised that there was no reaction to my comments. Are they not
worth replying to, or is there just not enough interest in this draft?
Resolver discovery seems like such an important topic given what is happening
with DoH and DoT, I can’t believe that folks aren’t interested in
Hi all,
The IETF106 Agenda is out
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/agenda.html and DNSOP has two
sessions:
Tuesday 17:10-18:40Tuesday Afternoon session III
Thursday 13:30-15:30Thursday Afternoon session I
As with the previous IETF meetings, we are planning the first meeting
