On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 2:52 PM Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/28/19 2:20 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> > - has the advice to anchor a private namespace in a registered domain in
> > the private namespace really been received and judged to be
> > insufficient?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Or has it just not been
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 2:52 PM Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/28/19 2:20 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> > - does the growth in observed query traffic for names with non-existant
> > top-level labels really support the idea that squatting on arbitrary
> > undelegated TLDs is on the rise? Is it possible
On Thu, 2019-11-21 at 15:37 +0800, Ben Schwartz wrote:
> I think we are talking about performance in a situation that (a) is so
> pathological that it will almost never happen and (b) at worst, will only
> slow down failure, not success. For that reason, I would avoid introducing
> any
Doug Barton writes:
> I don't doubt Jaap.
Thank you.
> What I doubt is that any organization as political
> as ISO (or ICANN) will hold preferences stable in the absence of a
> controlling policy.
Here are some more facts from the trivia corner.
The ISO was started from 1947. The first
Hello Daniel,
On Sun, 2019-11-17 at 07:50 +, Daniel Migault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find our draft that provides recommendations for DNSSEC resolvers
> Operators. Any comment is appreciated!
>
> Yours,
> Daniel
>
> -Original Message-
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Sent:
