On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:37 PM Warren Kumari wrote:
> Hi there all,
>
> I stumbled across this while cleaning out my mailbox -- I *think* that
> this makes sense, and that I should accept this as Hold For Document
> Update (
>
Warren Kumari writes:
> I stumbled across this while cleaning out my mailbox -- I *think* that
> this makes sense, and that I should accept this as Hold For Document
> Update (
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/processing-rfc-errata/
> ) - does anyone disagree?
> If so, please
Catherine
Appreciate the feedback. The authors have other issues to address, and
we'll add this to the queue.
Thanks
Tim
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:51 AM Catherine Meadows via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Reviewer: Catherine Meadows
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> This draft
