Eric Orth <erico...@google.com> writes:

> Regarding TC-bit: I would still prefer adding a sentence or two that error 
> generators should keep
> the EXTRA-TEXT field short to minimize the need for truncation.

Seems reasonable.  I'll need to go back and find your text since I don't
remember it specifically.  But I'll happily add it.

> Regarding forwarding: Making it implementer-choice generally seems
> good to me.  But I am unsure what the current draft means by "properly
> attributed".  What is the proper way to attribute an EDE?

Well, the wording there that we put is was designed to indicate you
should somehow describe where you got the information from.  But we're
not prescribing how, since that's implementation dependent.  Any
suggested text you'd prefer?
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to