Re: [DNSOP] On Powerbind

Warren, Comments in line On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 20:31, Warren Kumari wrote: >8 > Just checking - the DNSKEY Flags field is 16 bits, and we have so far burned: > Bit 15 - SEP > Bit 7 - Zone key > Bit 8 - Revoked > Did I miss any (I wasn't able to find a registry for this)? > > If not, we still

Re: [DNSOP] On Powerbind

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 10:39 PM Ben Schwartz wrote: > > Thanks for the explanation, Paul. Overall, I agree that Powerbind seems > low-risk, so I don't mind it being available for people who care about it. Just checking - the DNSKEY Flags field is 16 bits, and we have so far burned: Bit 15 -

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: [EXT] New Version Notification for draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-01.txt

Op 16-04-2020 om 16:05 schreef Richard Gibson: > Doesn't that preclude scenarios in which a zone transitions from one > catalog to another? Not necessarily, but we do need to provide more text here to describe precisely how that would work yes. So thanks for bringing that up! Something like:

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: [EXT] New Version Notification for draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-01.txt

Doesn't that preclude scenarios in which a zone transitions from one catalog to another? On 4/16/20 09:17, Willem Toorop wrote: An authoritative nameserver might have two or more catalog zones, each associated with their own set of configuration. In that case, the member zone that was

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: [EXT] New Version Notification for draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-01.txt

Op 16-04-2020 om 14:37 schreef Bob Harold: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 5:27 AM Willem Toorop > wrote: > > Dear all, > > This is the new catalog zones draft as presented yesterday at the > DNSOP WG Interim meeting. The idea of catalog zones is to establish >

Re: [DNSOP] On Powerbind

> Il 15/04/2020 02:24 Paul Wouters ha scritto: > > And we might disagree about the value of enforcment. But as I tried > to explain during the meeting, the value added is not for our little > community of engineers that trust each other. It is for people at large > to not need to trust some

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: [EXT] New Version Notification for draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-01.txt

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 5:27 AM Willem Toorop wrote: > Dear all, > > This is the new catalog zones draft as presented yesterday at the DNSOP WG > Interim meeting. The idea of catalog zones is to establish automatic zone > provisioning along existing primary/secondary relationships. > This is an

Re: [DNSOP] Doodle poll for DNSOP WG interim 23 April 2020

Gentle reminder. Poll closes today. https://doodle.com/poll/zk9f4ur7fycz3kra Thank you, Suzanne, Tim and Benno On 14/04/2020 18:26, Benno Overeinder wrote: > Dear DNSOP WG, > > Thank you for your time and participation in the DNSOP WG meeting today. > > The next DNSOP WG interim

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-23.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title : A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate Authors : M. Andrews