The incremental effort to implement SHA-224 if you are implementing SHA-256
is miniscule. It makes no sense to me for SHA-224 to be NOT RECOMMENDED to
use when SHA-256 is MUST implement and RECOMMENDED to use and you can use
SHA-256 with truncation to 224 or even fewer bits.
Thanks,
Donald
Moin!
On 4 May 2020, at 21:08, Tim Wicinski wrote:
This starts a Call for Adoption for
draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements
The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements/
Please review this draft to see if you think it
