Dear Tim Wicinski,
The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled.
Below is the scheduled session information followed by
the original request.
dnsop Session 1 (1:40 requested)
Wednesday, 29 July 2020, Session I 1100-1240
Room Name: Room 3 size: 3
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:14 AM Paul Hoffman wrote:
> The interpretation of whether a partial RRset is allowed by 1035/2181 made
> by JohnL, PaulV, and MukundS are all plausible and conflicting. RFC 1035
> and RFC 2181 are unclear about whether an RRset that is required in a reply
> can be
The interpretation of whether a partial RRset is allowed by 1035/2181 made by
JohnL, PaulV, and MukundS are all plausible and conflicting. RFC 1035 and RFC
2181 are unclear about whether an RRset that is required in a reply can be
partial.
draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional as it stands is
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 03:29:01PM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> On Thursday, 2 July 2020 14:50:24 UTC John R Levine wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > > ... but our goal should be to allow smart initiators to avoid
> > > retrying with TCP out of reflex. my recommendation of TC=0 is
On Thursday, 2 July 2020 14:50:24 UTC John R Levine wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > ... but our goal should be to allow smart initiators to avoid
> > retrying with TCP out of reflex. my recommendation of TC=0 is to suppress
> > reflexive TCP retries.
> I wouldn't disagree but it
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, Paul Vixie wrote:
until someone invents faster than light travel, round trips and remote state
will be the second and third most expensive things on the internet. (the most
expensive thing is complexity.) i think we can usefully discuss whether to set
TC=1 if the only thing
On Thursday, 2 July 2020 07:47:36 UTC Paul Vixie wrote:
> On Thursday, 2 July 2020 01:18:16 UTC John Levine wrote:
> > ...
>
> this is the draft where that issue would be decided, so it's good we're
> talking about it. ...
by the way, this is what kato and i, and later jabley, were trying to get
On Thursday, 2 July 2020 01:18:16 UTC John Levine wrote:
> In article <9056955.dJ39pTEj9z@linux-9daj> you write:
> >On Wednesday, 1 July 2020 09:41:49 UTC Jan Včelák wrote:
> >> ...
> >
> >i think if you're using round robin or random selection, a subset is fine.
> >if we had to codify this
