Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-01.txt

2021-02-19 Thread cpolish=40surewest . net
On 2021-02-19 18:45, Havard Eidnes wrote: > However, "burning" a new RR just for this purpose seems to me to > not be necessary, so I favour the scheme in 5.6 using a TXT > record instead. My reading of RFC 5507 "Design Choices When Expanding the DNS" §6 (

[DNSOP] for dnsop consideration: draft-hardaker-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-02.txt

2021-02-19 Thread Wes Hardaker
Greetings all, Viktor and I have been working on a BCP to provide guidance on selecting reasonable NSEC3 parameters. We'd love your feedback and for dnsop to consider adopting it. A new version of I-D, draft-hardaker-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Wes Hardaker

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-01.txt

2021-02-19 Thread Havard Eidnes
> During the last hackathon at IETF-109, a new idea emerged where the > version of a member zone in a catalog (indicated by the member zone's > SOA serial number) is also in the catalog. This can help ensuring > dissemination of member zones in a catalog from the primary to the > secondary

Re: [DNSOP] IETF 110 Agenda and Call for Agenda Items DNSOP WG

2021-02-19 Thread Willem Toorop
I'd like to request 20 minuted for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones. We have a lot to discuss! Op 18-02-2021 om 17:23 schreef Benno Overeinder: > Hi all, > > The IETF 110 Agenda is out https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/agenda. > > DNSOP has two sessions scheduled: > >     dnsop