Re: [DNSOP] [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-09

2021-05-29 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 08:55:16PM -0700, Qin Wu via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Qin Wu > Review result: Ready > > This draft defines DNS Query Name Minimisation mechanism, it is motivated by > QNAME minimisation implementation lesson and experience and well documented. I > believe it is

Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-salgado-dnsop-rrserial in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2021-05-29 Thread Paul Wouters
On May 29, 2021, at 03:20, libor.peltan wrote: > > Hi, > > just an idea: I don't know how important the amplification factor is. Does that even matter these days ? dig txt cnn.com ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org

Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-salgado-dnsop-rrserial in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2021-05-29 Thread libor.peltan
Hi, just an idea: I don't know how important the amplification factor is. If it is, the proposed EDNS option would have the advantage of practically no answer:query amplification, unlike multi-query or additional SOA. Libor Dne 28. 05. 21 v 21:27 Peter Thomassen napsal(a): Hi, I like the