Dear DNSOP,
Changes to this draft from the previous version are as follows:
* Clarified scope to focus only on name server responses, and not
zone/registry data.
* Reorganized with section 2 as Types of Glue and section 3 as
Requirements.
* Removed any discussion of
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Glue In DNS Referral Responses Is Not Optional
Authors : M. Andrews
Dear DNSOP WG,
We are planning our second DNSOP WG interim meeting in the week of 25-29
October.
The draft dns-error-reporting is on the agenda for the interim meeting:
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting/
Please fill in the Doodle poll to settle on a day
On 07/10/2021 08:52, Mark Andrews wrote:
DNSSEC will work reasonably well if the upstream are just DNSSEC aware (keep the
RRSIGs with the data they cover, pass through negative proofs required for
the answers) if there is not spoofed traffic, a mix of DNSSEC aware and DNSSEC
oblivious server for
