John, thanks for the review.
> On Oct 28, 2021, at 6:42 AM, John Scudder via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
>
>
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
>
> Thanks for the
Hi Éric, thank you for the review!
> On Oct 28, 2021, at 5:33 AM, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
>
> Thank you for the work
> On 5 Nov 2021, at 3:19 pm, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
>
> Publishing iteration count higher than 10 is reckless as that affects the
> performance of recursive resolvers in particular the ones that run on small
> CPE equipment.
>
> The document should strongly discourage any use of NSEC3
>
Publishing iteration count higher than 10 is reckless as that affects the
performance of recursive resolvers in particular the ones that run on small CPE
equipment.
The document should strongly discourage any use of NSEC3
For the that want to keep using it the limit should be real low of
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 10:02 AM Wessels, Duane
wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 1, 2021, at 3:29 PM, Erik Kline wrote:
> >
> > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
> >
> >>>
> On Nov 1, 2021, at 3:29 PM, Erik Kline wrote:
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is safe.
>
>>> [S4.1, comment]
>>>
>>> * "Resolvers and other DNS clients
Wes,
On 05/11/2021 09:40, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
On 04/11/2021 23.44, Wes Hardaker wrote:
The most important sticking point is there are 4 implementations (thank
you for the links Matthijs) that have implemented 150. Since DNSOP
strives for implementations of specs, I think this is the number
On 04/11/2021 23.44, Wes Hardaker wrote:
The most important sticking point is there are 4 implementations (thank
you for the links Matthijs) that have implemented 150. Since DNSOP
strives for implementations of specs, I think this is the number we
should publish*unless the vendors speak up and
[ Quoting in "[DNSOP] nsec3-parameters opinions g..." ]
I was waiting for the last discussion to die down (and then, um, for me
to finally examine the opinions). The results are in from the people
that weighed in:
| who | wants | accepts|
