Also let's ensure there are several experts like we have for new RR Types.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 4:06 PM Eric Orth wrote:
> I'm happy as long as things are still fast and easy enough to support
> new/experimental/prototype usage. I think Expert Review with the proposed
> stuff for that
I'm happy as long as things are still fast and easy enough to support
new/experimental/prototype usage. I think Expert Review with the proposed
stuff for that expert to review is all reasonable for that goal. If we
start getting into stricter bars than Expert Review, that's where we'd have
to
I think Expert Review makes sense (with the expert reviewing the SHOULD
around the specification).
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 8:34 PM Martin Thomson wrote:
> I agree with Tommy.
>
> Selecting an expert who is able to recognize when wider review might help
> is a far lower bar than the one Ray
Hi Paul,
in the implementation I suggested, the new DNS RR types are not used
for making people (administrator, decision-maker, CISO) communicating
together but as an information source that is simple enough to be
understood by everyone without the need of filtering and sorting data.
I commented
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022, Eugène Adell wrote:
Beyond the technical aspects, there are several different persons to
think about in our case : the DNS administrator obviously, the
decision maker buying (or not) a secured online service, and the CISO.
Why should this information exchange happen via
Hello,
thanks for your constructive comments. My answers are just below, with
an updated document (from Duane's remarks, Mark's ones will follow
later).
1.
Beyond the technical aspects, there are several different persons to
think about in our case : the DNS administrator obviously, the
decision
Many thanks for reading the draft.
> from: "Paul Wouters" on Mon, 2022-04-11
> to: zhangcuiling
> cc: dnsop
> subject: Re: [DNSOP] A new draft on SM2 digital signature algorithm for DNSSEC
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2022, zhangcuiling wrote:
>
> > And the main purpose is to improve the diversity of
