Internet-Drafts "expire" but they never go away. The IETF makes them
publicly accessible on an "archival" basis. RFC 8447 is an example of an
RFC that lists them specifically as a suitable specification form, without
limitation. My impression is that the WG consensus was for this draft to
do the
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-09: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://ww
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 3:12 PM Ben Schwartz wrote:
> Yes, that's covered in the description:
>
> The designated expert MUST ensure that the Format Reference is stable and
> publicly available, and that it specifies how to convert the
> SvcParamValue's presentation format to wire format. The Forma
Hi all,
The following newly adopted DNSOP WG drafts are on the agenda for the
interim meeting:
- dnssec-automation, Ulrich Wisser and Shumon Huque
- dnssec-bootstrapping, Peter Thomassen and Nils Wisiol
We want to close the Doodle poll at the end of Wednesday, 11 May.
Best regards,
Suzanne,
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 12:09 PM wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the
> IETF.
>
> Title : Service binding and parameter specification via
> the DNS (DN
Robert Wilton via Datatracker writes:
> One minor point, I found it slightly confusing in various places as to whether
> "iterations" meant "total number of interactions" or the "iterations
> parameter"
> that refers to the number of extra interactions. Hence I would suggest
> changing "iterati
Hi,
On 2022-4-29, at 13:54, Lars Eggert wrote:
> the IESG is reviewing what has happened.
the IESG discussed this issue. Below is my personal attempt to summarize the
outcome of this discussion.
We believe that it is permissible under the current rules to include sections
of text that others
Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refe
