Hi Andrew,
If you want to claim that because of the recommendations in it, this
document should be standards track instead of BCP, there might be some
merit to such a position, although personally I think it is fine as a BCP
and I don't think the code point allocation has anything to do with this
The Domain Name System Operations (dnsop) WG will hold
a virtual interim meeting on 2022-05-24 from 19:00 to 20:00 Europe/Amsterdam
(17:00 to 18:00 UTC).
Agenda:
Agenda
* Chairs, Administrivia (10 min)
* Ulrich Wisser and Shumon Huque, DNSSEC Automation (25 min)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/d
Hi,
Please find an updated version of our document. The intention of the
document is to provide guidance for an operator to operate a DNSSEC
resolver. Any feedback, comment is of course welcome.
Yours,
Daniel
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 12:41 PM wrote:
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from th
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Recommendations for DNSSEC Resolvers Operators
Authors : Daniel Migault
All,
The Doodle poll is closed and we have selected:
Tuesday May 24, 17:00-18:00 UTC
The details and agenda of the interim meeting will be shared in a
separate email.
-- Benno
On 10/05/2022 00:08, Benno Overeinder wrote:
Hi all,
The following newly adopted DNSOP WG drafts are on the
