Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-08.txt

2022-08-21 Thread Kazunori Fujiwara
Dear dnsop WG, Thanks very muc for WGLC comments. Authors collected comments and updated the draft to -08. Please check whether your comments has been reflected and whether these updates are acceptable and sufficient. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation/ >

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-08.txt

2022-08-21 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title : Fragmentation Avoidance in DNS Authors : Kazunori Fujiwara Paul

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-16: please review

2022-08-21 Thread Paul Vixie
Vladimír Čunát wrote on 2022-08-21 11:30: On 19/08/2022 20.06, Paul Wouters wrote: Security Considerations could say that .alt queries MUST NOT be forwarded to other DNS servers for resolution. There's a dilemma with SUDNs.  If a resolver isn't allowed to "send the name upstream", it might

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-16: please review

2022-08-21 Thread Vladimír Čunát
On 19/08/2022 20.06, Paul Wouters wrote: Security Considerations could say that .alt queries MUST NOT be forwarded to other DNS servers for resolution. There's a dilemma with SUDNs.  If a resolver isn't allowed to "send the name upstream", it might not be able to return DNSSEC-correct denial. 

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Questions / concerns with draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https (in RFC Editor queue)

2022-08-21 Thread Warren Kumari
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 1:29 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Aug 20, 2022, at 10:07 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > Pausing publication is an unusual, but definitely not unprecedented, step. > Although we are able to make changes until a document is published as an > RFC, once it is approved and sent