On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 8:53 AM wrote:
>
> A new version (-09) has been submitted for
> draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-09.txt
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-09.html
>
>
> The IETF
Hi Catherine,
Op 09-12-2022 om 23:17 schreef Catherine Meadows via Datatracker:
The security considerations section gives a number of reasonable authentication
and privacy requirements, but does stops short of the use of the word MUST. Is
MUST avoided because it is not yet practical?
We
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : DNS Catalog Zones
Authors : Peter van Dijk
Libor Peltan
Hi Russ, Lars and Roman,
Thank you for your review Russ. Your (minor) concerns have all been
addressed and we will soon upload a new version of the draft with,
amongst others, your concerns and nits addressed.
Lars and Roman, this reply also addresses your IESG comments on the use
of the
Hi Murray, Hi Éric,
I have added Éric on CC because he also asked for a IANA registry for
catalog zones properties (which we have added).
Op 28-12-2022 om 23:29 schreef Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker:
(1) It's expected (required?), with no actions for IANA, to expressly include a
section
