> Em 6 de mai. de 2023, à(s) 12:20, John Levine escreveu:
>
> It appears that Joe Abley said:
>> Pre-delegation checks add friction to the domain registration process. They
>> further complicate the commuications between different actors in the
>> commercial graph
>> (registrars,
> On 12 May 2023, at 12:09, John R Levine wrote:
>
>>> Yeah, that's a better way to put it. But the main point still stands,
>>> that it would be a signficant operational change to insist that all
>>> delegated NS be active when delegated, and even moreso to insist that
>>> they continue to be
Yeah, that's a better way to put it. But the main point still stands,
that it would be a signficant operational change to insist that all
delegated NS be active when delegated, and even moreso to insist that
they continue to be active.
No, it is not a “significant” change. It should just be a
> On 12 May 2023, at 11:35, John Levine wrote:
>
> It appears that Mark Andrews said:
>>> Oh, I completely agree. My point was just that even in the root which is
>>> small and you
>>> would hope would change slowly, it's still a challenge to track what's lame.
>>
>> It’s not a challenge
It appears that Mark Andrews said:
>> Oh, I completely agree. My point was just that even in the root which is
>> small and you
>> would hope would change slowly, it's still a challenge to track what's lame.
>
>It’s not a challenge to track what is lame. It’s dead simple. You just have
>to
> Recommendations for DNSSEC Resolvers Operators
>draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements-04
Before I dive into some paragraph-by-paragraph details, and bury the
lede, my main high-level issue is with sections 9, primarily on
substance, but also for IMHO notably
> On 9 May 2023, at 03:13, John Levine wrote:
>
> It appears that Kim Davies said:
>> With that said, I think the root zone is probably not an instructive
>> use case for the broader question. Unlike typical zones, at the root it
>> can be said every delegation is to critical Internet
Reviewer: Nicolai Leymann
Review result: Ready
Hi,
I was assigned as the dnsdir reviewer for ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional.
The document is on standards track and describes the DNS Glue requirements in
Referral Responses. It updates RFC1034 (one of the core RFCs for DNS). The
draft is well
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain Name System
Operations (DNSOP) WG of the IETF.
Title : Compact Denial of Existence in DNSSEC
Authors : Shumon Huque
