Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements

2023-05-17 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi Peter, Thanks for the response. I think I need to understand better how revalidation is performed. Yours, Daniel On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 4:26 PM Peter Thomassen wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 5/17/23 22:01, Daniel Migault wrote: > > I agree but as far as can see the cap of the TTL with a

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements

2023-05-17 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi Peter, Thanks you very much for these comments. I will look carefully how to implement carefully these comments in our new version. Yours, Daniel On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 1:08 PM Peter Thomassen wrote: > > > On 5/12/23 23:09, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > Repost of my belated comments in the

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements

2023-05-17 Thread Peter Thomassen
Hi Daniel, On 5/17/23 22:01, Daniel Migault wrote: I agree but as far as can see the cap of the TTL with a revalidation will not only resync the resolver and the zone more often than could be expected otherwise but does not result in the cached RRsets differing from those provided by the

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements

2023-05-17 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi Viktor, Thanks for the feedbacks. Please see my comment/responses below. Yours, Daniel On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 5:10 PM Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 03:21:27PM -0400, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > > This starts a Working Group Last Call for > >