Dear WG,
The extended WGLC for rfc8499-bis did not conclude with rough consensus
on either of the two proposed definitions of the term "lame delegation".
There was some consensus in a subthread on one of the proposed
definitions, earlier formulated on the mailing list, see the original
threa
Hi Daniel,
On 5/18/23 02:26, Daniel Migault wrote:
On 5/17/23 22:01, Daniel Migault wrote:
> I agree but as far as can see the cap of the TTL with a revalidation
will only resync the resolver and the zone more often than could be expected
otherwise but does not result in the cached RR
