Hi Paul, all,
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:46:30AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2023, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote:
>
> [co-author hat on]
>
[...]
>
> > ### Continuing Ownership
> >
> > While I see the example in Appendix A.1
Reviewer: Benjamin Kaduk
Review result: Has Issues
# SecDir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques-01
CC @kaduk
## Discuss
## Comments
I'm a little nervous about allocating a new BCP number for a topic of fairly
narrow scope such as this, but the guidance is good and worth
t;
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 10:18 PM Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <
> nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> > --
> > DISCUSS:
> > ---
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 05:19:20PM -0500, Ben Schwartz wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone know if there is a way to make something quoted in the
> TXT output and code-formatted in the HTML output? Or is that discouraged
> to avoid discrepancy between the renderings?
The "quoted in TXT and code-formatted
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 02:46:05PM +1100, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2022, at 14:18, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote:
> > This (mostly implicit) requirement is a potential barrier for adoption of
> > the HTTPS RRtype, and while the precondition is v
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-08: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
, Duane wrote:
> Hi Ben, thank you for the detailed review. It has taken me a while to work
> through
> all of your comments and suggestions, but hopefully this addresses them
> sufficiently.
>
>
>
> > On Oct 25, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 06:48:24PM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
>
> Benjamin Kaduk wrote on 2021-12-23 10:28:
> > Hi Duane,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:53:48PM +, Wessels, Duane wrote:
> >> ...
> >>
> >> Proposed new
Hi Duane,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:53:48PM +, Wessels, Duane wrote:
>
>
> > On Oct 26, 2021, at 4:35 AM, Lars Eggert via Datatracker
> > wrote:
[...]
> > Section 4.2. , paragraph 3, comment:
> >> DNS server software MAY provide a configurable limit on the number of
> >> transactions
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 01:09:00PM -0700, Erik Kline via Datatracker wrote:
> Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-13: Yes
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-13: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-10: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
Hi Lada,
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 10:46:09AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> thanks for the review, please see below.
>
> Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker writes:
>
> ...
>
> >
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-03: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
Thanks, Job -- that looks better than anything I would have come up with!
-Ben
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:10:27PM +0200, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:28:16PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> > > Section 3.1, etc.
> > >
> > > | The TTL of the NSEC RR that is returned MUST be
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-05: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-04: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
ching properties, it hasn’t been broken as of today. Also
> all DNS vendors have agreed to make this choice and the RFC here is merely a
> way how to ensure interoperability between various implementations.
>
> (Typing this on phone, so excuse any irregularities in the text.)
> Ondrej
&
Hi Ondřej,
Just because someone else does something, even a "big name", doesn't
necessarily make it a good idea for us to also do it.
We should be able to justify our algorithm choices on cryptographic
principles, not just appeal to authority.
In a similar vein, you said something about the
Hi Duane,
Thanks -- this all sounds good (and it sounds like Rob is okay with the new
thought for text about reporting, as well).
Thanks again!
-Ben
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 03:54:02PM +, Wessels, Duane wrote:
>
>
> > On Oct 11, 2020, at 9:03 PM, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 06:36:28PM +, Wessels, Duane wrote:
>
>
> > On Oct 8, 2020, at 4:18 AM, Robert Wilton via Datatracker
> > wrote:
[...]
> >2. The ZONEMD Resource Record
> >
> > It is
> > RECOMMENDED that a zone include only one ZONEMD RR, unless the zone
> >
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 11:34:11AM -0400, John Levine wrote:
> In article <20201010032517.gm89...@kduck.mit.edu> you write:
> >There's two general classes of attack to consider: when an external
> >attacker takes an existing ZONEMD and tries to modify the associated zone,
> >or when the zone
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-13: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Hi Rob,
One can do a bit of semi-generic analysis here to help motivate 12 bytes as
being a tolerable choice (one could make some argument for 32 being the
right length to actually use, but the protocol-mandated floor does not
necessarilly need to be the "full protection" value as there can be
Hi Duane,
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 07:59:54PM +, Wessels, Duane wrote:
> Hi Benjamin, thanks for the extensive review and comments. Responses are
> inline. As you've noted some of this overlaps with Roman's comments as
> well.
>
>
> > On Oct 6, 2020, at 10:41 A
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-12: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-15: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:14:26PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:04 AM Vittorio Bertola
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Il 22/04/2020 19:15 Benjamin Kaduk v
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-14: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Hi Shumon,
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:44:30AM -0400, Shumon Huque wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 1:09 AM Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <
> nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks for this document; it's pretty clear and it's good to have these
> > procedur
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-19: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2845bis-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 02:59:16PM -0500, Dave Lawrence wrote:
> Thank you very much for your review, Ben.
>
> Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker writes:
> >For a comprehensive treatment of DNS terms, please see [RFC8499].
> >
> > (side note: I myself would not use th
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 03:50:43PM -0800, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker wrote:
>
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
>
> * I agree with Mirja, Section 8 is more informative
Hi Brian,
I agree that this updated text provides more clarity about why the
change is being made, but I am not sure that it fully addresses all of
the concerns you raised, and would appreciate your thoughts.
Specifically, you had raised the possibility of existing, fielded,
implementations that
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 12:20:21PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
> [ - IESG (for clutter), Bob & Tim (through DNSOP / Chairs respectively) ]
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 7:55 AM Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 5 Apr 2019, Bob Harold wrote:
> >
> > [ SNIP ]
> >
> > > In a similar vein, if
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 10:49:42AM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2018, Scott Morizot wrote:
>
> > I guess I'll speak up as someone who has been managing the DNS/DNSSEC
> > design and implementation of a large
> > organization with a complex set of DNS requirements
>
> Thanks for
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 03:43:20PM +, Sara Dickinson wrote:
>
> > On 24 Nov 2018, at 03:58, Benjamin Kaduk > <mailto:ka...@mit.edu>> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:01:00PM +, Sara Dickinson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Sectio
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:01:00PM +, Sara Dickinson wrote:
>
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: Benjamin Kaduk mailto:ka...@mit.edu>>
> > Subject: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on
> > draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format-08: (with DISCUSS and COMME
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 01:53:09PM +, Sara Dickinson wrote:
>
>
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: Benjamin Kaduk mailto:ka...@mit.edu>>
> > Subject: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on
> > draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format-08: (with DISCUSS and
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format-08: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-15: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 04:56:18PM +0200, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:
> Sorry, one more comment on section 11.1:
> "DSO permits zero round-trip operation using TCP Fast Open [RFC7413]
> with TLS 1.3 [RFC8446] 0-RTT to reduce or eliminate round trips in
> session establishment.“
>
> This
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Hi Ted,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 01:03:21AM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2018, at 12:55 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> > Yup. Sorry about that. I just submitted a new version that I hope
> > addresses this request.
>
> There's a mistake in the update—while I was working on the new text, I
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-15: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-15: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 09:38:54AM +1100, Ólafur Guðmundsson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:13 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
> > Hi Ólafur,
> >
> > Before I get into the inline comments, I should note something that I only
> > noticed after I posted my ballot posi
te that entry in the registry to also refer to this document, but
it would be nice for the relationship to be more explicit.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 08:51:45AM +1100, Ólafur Guðmundsson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 1:48 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
> > Benjamin Kaduk has entered t
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-07: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 10:53:57AM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
> > > We specifically didn’t want to reference DoH since HTTP is unsuitable
> > for long lived connections and DSO wouldn’t apply here. We didn’t want
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:53:57PM -0400, Tom Pusateri wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 27, 2018, at 11:24 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> >
> >
> >
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 04:14:41PM -0400, Tom Pusateri wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 31, 2018, at 3:53 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> If the RCODE is set to any value other than NOERROR (0) or DSOTYPENI
> >> ([TBA2] tentatively 11), then the client MUST assume that the server
> >> does
Hi Mirja,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 08:11:52PM +0200, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:
> Hi Ben, hi all,
>
> as you summoned an TSV AD...
>
> > Am 27.07.2018 um 17:24 schrieb Benjamin Kaduk :
> >
> > I should probably leave this to my (transport-area?) colleagues t
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 09:33:20PM -0700, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
[snip]
>
> This next one is well within the "Spencer wouldn't have done it
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-12: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
65 matches
Mail list logo
